🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to restart negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Course

Araghchi is walking a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been eliminated. Following this, Western states employed their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in various formats if talks resume.

The American leader recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the strikes commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust hard to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and continues the primary resolution to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be respected."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this attack."