🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly bore the pressure of her parent’s reputation. As the offspring of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous English composers of the turn of the 20th century, the composer’s reputation was shrouded in the deep shadows of history.

A World Premiere

In recent months, I sat with these shadows as I prepared to make the inaugural album of the composer’s piano concerto from 1936. With its emotional harmonies, expressive melodies, and confident beats, her composition will grant new listeners deep understanding into how the composer – a composer during war originating from the early 1900s – conceived of her existence as a artist with mixed heritage.

Shadows and Truth

Yet about shadows. It can take a while to adjust, to perceive forms as they really are, to separate fact from misinterpretation, and I was reluctant to face the composer’s background for a while.

I earnestly desired her to be following in her father’s footsteps. In some ways, she was. The pastoral English palettes of Samuel’s influence can be heard in numerous compositions, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to look at the headings of her father’s compositions to understand how he viewed himself as not only a standard-bearer of English Romanticism as well as a advocate of the Black diaspora.

This was where Samuel and Avril seemed to diverge.

American society assessed the composer by the mastery of his music instead of the his ethnicity.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, the composer – the son of a Sierra Leonean father and a British mother – started to lean into his background. When the African American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar visited the UK in 1897, the 21-year-old composer eagerly sought him out. He adapted Dunbar’s African Romances to music and the subsequent year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral work that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, Samuel’s Hiawatha was an worldwide sensation, especially with African Americans who felt shared pride as the majority evaluated the composer by the quality of his art instead of the his race.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Fame failed to diminish his beliefs. During that period, he was present at the First Pan African Conference in the UK where he met the Black American thinker WEB Du Bois and saw a variety of discussions, such as the subjugation of the Black community there. He remained an advocate throughout his life. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders including this intellectual and this leader, gave addresses on racial equality, and even talked about matters of race with the US President on a trip to the presidential residence in 1904. As for his music, Du Bois recalled, “he wrote his name so high as a composer that it will endure.” He died in that year, at 37 years old. Yet how might the composer have reacted to his daughter’s decision to travel to the African nation in the that decade?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to South African policy,” declared a title in the African American magazine Jet magazine. The system “seems to me the right policy”, she informed Jet. When pushed to clarify, she backtracked: she didn’t agree with apartheid “fundamentally” and it “should be allowed to resolve itself, guided by benevolent South Africans of diverse ethnicities”. If Avril had been more in tune to her father’s politics, or born in segregated America, she might have thought twice about apartheid. However, existence had sheltered her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a UK passport,” she stated, “and the officials never asked me about my background.” Thus, with her “porcelain-white” complexion (as described), she traveled alongside white society, supported by their admiration for her late father. She delivered a lecture about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and led the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in Johannesburg, programming the heroic third movement of her Piano Concerto, subtitled: “In memory of my Father.” Even though a confident pianist personally, she never played as the lead performer in her piece. On the contrary, she consistently conducted as the leader; and so the orchestra of the era performed under her direction.

She desired, as she stated, she “could introduce a shift”. Yet in the mid-1950s, the situation collapsed. Once officials discovered her mixed background, she was forced to leave the country. Her British passport didn’t protect her, the diplomatic official urged her to go or be jailed. She came home, embarrassed as the extent of her naivety became clear. “This experience was a hard one,” she stated. Increasing her disgrace was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from South Africa.

A Recurring Theme

As I sat with these legacies, I felt a recurring theme. The account of identifying as British until it’s revoked – which recalls Black soldiers who fought on behalf of the English throughout the second world war and made it through but were not given their earned rewards. And the Windrush generation,