🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."